You would do well to examine the history of the terms "anarchism" and "libertarianism" because they are one and the same.
Falsified (and falsifying) "L"ibertarianism is found festering within the grassroots movement based in a 'desire for liberty, as is the definition of libertarianism just like falsified (and falsifying) "A"narchism is found festering within the grassroots movement based in a 'transcendence of hierarchy', as is the definition of anarchism.
The very publications of their unified/singular/common/integrated movement is even found in their documents.
Example: "Towards Anarchism: Order in Freedom" (formerly "Views and Comments") - #50 (Summer 1965), BOTH published by The Libertarian League (Cooper Station, New York City).
The members were the same. The concepts were the same. This was NOT after some Bolshevik purge. Simply, the titles were modified due to recuperations by the ruling class and its media agents.
Is it no different today?
Okay, maybe the writers and actors (Black Bloc) themselves are on the payroll, but the game of defending against a daily infringement upon everything is at hand.
Saying that "libertarians suck" is like saying that any other "ism" sucks; it's rather pointless unless you expose where the useful truth still exists within and beneath kidnapped terms.
It happened with the tea party and the occupy grassroots movements, and as long as liars exist for pay from a pyramid scheme that is never challenged AS A WHOLE, then it will continue and continue and continue and....
Falsified (and falsifying) "L"ibertarianism is found festering within the grassroots movement based in a 'desire for liberty, as is the definition of libertarianism just like falsified (and falsifying) "A"narchism is found festering within the grassroots movement based in a 'transcendence of hierarchy', as is the definition of anarchism.
The very publications of their unified/singular/common/integrated movement is even found in their documents.
Example: "Towards Anarchism: Order in Freedom" (formerly "Views and Comments") - #50 (Summer 1965), BOTH published by The Libertarian League (Cooper Station, New York City).
The members were the same. The concepts were the same. This was NOT after some Bolshevik purge. Simply, the titles were modified due to recuperations by the ruling class and its media agents.
Is it no different today?
Okay, maybe the writers and actors (Black Bloc) themselves are on the payroll, but the game of defending against a daily infringement upon everything is at hand.
Saying that "libertarians suck" is like saying that any other "ism" sucks; it's rather pointless unless you expose where the useful truth still exists within and beneath kidnapped terms.
It happened with the tea party and the occupy grassroots movements, and as long as liars exist for pay from a pyramid scheme that is never challenged AS A WHOLE, then it will continue and continue and continue and....
No comments:
Post a Comment