The murder of ideology is a prerequisite to the awakening of 'the truly human'.... The way we relate to views and each other is why we fail to change anything but lifestyles, culture, and fashion. We act as commodities and reproduce our very unconsciousness.Recently, I sent a link to a Sorcha Faal article in to about ten Yahoo mail groups (classifying themselves as "conspiracy", "fringe", "religion", etc.) as a discussion point, and not as "Truth" since that is a concept whose capital "T" should warrant inquiry, critique, and scrutiny unless we enjoy being in the same place wherever we go. To me, that is tantamount to being dead.... Striving for this absolutist and absolutizing Truth freezes us in our own headlight. It is the trap we construct for ourselves. Human subjectivity dies every time we objectify humanity; it is an unconscious act of the suicidal and the humanicidal. It is what herds of slaves do best.
Combining paraphrased old sayings: those not busy becoming are just being. I prefer feeling the air move past me as I move to the state of a windless, lifeless state of self-entropy. You reach out experientially for truth or it will not exist for you.
We are not so easily "correct" by merely censoring everything that "doesn't fit into our "truth bag". Since all of those with the "correct views" have done nothing to rid us of all forms of Virulent Hierarchy run by our finest psychopaths, I'd suggest that they do NOT possess this all-too-convenient and all-knowing perspective. And, even if they could argue that they do have some access to it, where are the implemented manifestations (not run by the visible and intended-invisible hands of theocrats, intel groups, and cults) of this humanity becoming more human[e] and 'for itself'?! That separation of "theory" and "practice", or "the theoretical" and the practical" is the fly in the ointment that exposes the view as ideology, or the inversion of the unified "theory-in-practice", where the input and output are one continuous process. Ideology, so easily seen in the "Leninoid" ilk, imposes one view on the themselves as "practice" for imposing it on everyone else, demonstrated in the murder of millions.
Apparently, "sharing" is oft-considered a dangerous trait, because one's unconsciousness to being colonized is offended. Any self-sense that one is "open-minded" is felt as disturbing. We sense a "possession" which compels us to suppress, and which evokes a para-phobic panic, a frenzying frustration, and a livid anger. This "possession" impells from us acts of pathos commonly referred to as "evil". We act against our own subjectivity because we act against the subjectivity in others.
Instead of facilitating this colonizing "offense" we sheepishly choose to comply. That "choice" is a Big Lie calling obedience as some kind of freedom. We could merely glance at anything else that attracts us more, but the colonizing wants our complicity in elitistically-destroying that which offends it. Nope. We must hurl at the message and the messenger. The source of real freedom — other people and other views — is the enemy of all ideology, of all colonization. Assassination of self and other: the line "between" is transparent. With any pyramid scheme, the ignorance of compliance is the reluctance to challenge how we redefine our own ignorance as anything but ignorance. Maintaining the appearance of consciousness is tough work and is the core to being a good citizen who maintains the pyramid. We scheme our subjectivity into the vaults of those at the top so that their psychopathic hunger is quenched. Our generalized massochism has a pathetic reward: a sense of belonging. Unfortunately, belonging to a herd is a longing that is embedded and implanted. The real "alien abductions" are embracements of the pyramidal 'social alienation'. The satisfying of fetish is not satisfying unless the awareness of its presence and the paltriness of its reward is hidden, reinforced, and enforced — both internally and externally.
Any "danger" is manufactured by the ideology clutched to by to the ideologified.... Hosting that brain disorder finds all possible evidence to its contrary, as suppressible, and goes to any lengths to discredit, censor, or attack the messenger and message. The old adage of "just change the channel" or "if you don't like the book, stop reading it" seem appropriate, however, grasping for "rationales" for suppressing it is what the Authoritarian Personality prefers.... They "know what's best" for the rest of us, and usually end up killing us "for your own good". Pathos par excellence.
Apparently needing a reason to share... I'm merely sharing someone's view of a reality experienced by us all (as the Indian proverbial "blind men" with their "elephant") who perhaps best ought discuss 'inclusively' in order to get beyond their unique (and 'exclusive') blindness(es). A crime? A violation? An outrage? A danger.
As well, I was unaware that a "list" was greater than its members? The "moderation" of topics is rarely standardized and blocking/filtering is most often a discretion which is psycho-emotional, and I accept that. Nonetheless, when one is blocked why others are not, it brings us to an explicit tip of an implicit paradox. Now, if discussing that paradox is also blocked, we see why we get nowhere in terms of changing the world. We ourselves block open discussion in favor of stasis and petrified "truths", which possess us more than we possess them.
That sad and global pandemia is called "reification" and our inverted 'self-power' — relinquished in millions of invisible daily surrenders — is the glue which prevents the "pyramid scheme" and its pharaohs, in one weighty structure upon all of our backs. Self-maintained blindness is revealed in the order disguised as advice, "put your back into it": slaves acting FOR their enslavement: a vector-point of the two meanings of the word "dumb", the ignorant and the unspoken.
So, if we are to supersede "alienation", "reification", "ideology", "religion" (versus lived human 'spirit'uality), "mass psychology", and all other points of the generalized 'bow-and-scrape', we ought consider sharing with less cynicality.
Cynicism is a plague released by the postmodernists — especially the deconstructionists-deconstructivists who fail to re-totalize what they dismantle — rationally sliding us into objects in cartons... easily sorted, filed, subjugated, ad finitum, ad nauseam.
It is a falsified "inquiry" which refuses other views in order to control its 'host', as in Robert Heinlein's book, The Puppet Masters, or the hypnotic chants of the organic "citizen"-robots in Orwell's book, Nineteen Eighty-four, depicting his former associates at the elitist factory, the Fabian Society.
The internet is a pisser in that neither your nor my body language, voice inflection, or wit is given its moment of authenticity, its space for justice, which is precisely why it is tolerated as the major form of "social networking". All "crosstalk" is filtered, we are categorized, and, our pseudo-social communication — as a unified form-and-content — is thoroughly controlled by "the top" while, we, at the bottom, screw ourselves over, and over, and over... as a matter of becoming internet data-objects. Our behavior [cf. Wilhelm Reich's books, The Mass Pyschology of Fascism, Listen, Little Man, and People in Trouble.] keeps us where we are: nowhere. And, going in circles, like the prisoners in the 1978 film, "Midnight Express", we circle our enslavement in protective formation, psycho-enforcing a "wholistic" slavery on ourselves and upon each other with behaviorial precision.
Receiving several notices of "moderated"-away submissions of the shared link, steeped in a black-or-white view of the "Sorcha Faal" pen, sparked my curious nature as to why such disturbance and outrage exists at all. After all, everyone and every moment contains a kernel of truth. The commodified, ideologified, character-armored, reified, alienated, and religionified reveal their buried and kidnapped humanity only if you open your eyes and mind, a stretch for the well-programmed.
We "sift" together to find it and try to construct fresh and directly-useful (unmediated by hierarchy)"totalities", with which to use as tools of change.
If we get frozen into seeing only "Tweedledum OR Tweedledee" choices instead of also including what they so intentionally hide outside of their false dichotomies, then we are the very sources of the 'non-truthers movement'.
Anyone sharing a view with me directly or indirectly is the human gift.
If I understand anything better after experiencing the inexperiencability of the formalized flatness of the internet — with its formalized antithesis of authentic 'social networking' and its contential dishumanizing behavior 'content' — it is that unfettered and dis-ledgerbooked 'gifting' remains to be created if we are to go anywhere other than nowhere fast.
So, thanks. I appreciate any (very rare these daze) direct email. The email lists are better than nothing, sometimes. ASCII is a poor substitute for people dancing, singing, laughing, and "breaking bread" together, however, if I get to speak offline with one warm-blooded human who is not so busy rationing away their humanity, then I consider that wonderful, like hearing, albeit for just a moment, the bagpipe music coming from the ship in the film, "Invasion of the Body Snatchers". The communication on the internet is deafening and it tends to bury real people in data and cyniciscal data and footnotes so that original thought and imagination are suffocated.
By the way, since I send my "info" emails to numerous groups at the same time, a bleak way to "communicate" I suppose, I appreciate any emails that refer specifically to the group list(s) upon which it was seen.
